From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20071228174512.66834830BC9@snark.thyrsus.com> <17EA38DF-BCC1-4565-8510-5DD10DD667E3@mac.com> <20071229114551.GD9794@thyrsus.com> <20080102021907.GA15494@thyrsus.com> <200801020445.m024jWU2008538@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199354172 1132 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2008 09:56:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, esr@snark.thyrsus.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, harsanyi@mac.com To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 03 10:56:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JAMoR-0000r0-PF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:56:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMo5-000166-Fr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:56:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMiO-0005VR-G6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMiM-0005Tw-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMiL-0005To-VF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAMiL-0000lV-Ka; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAMiL-00089Q-9i; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:13 -0500 In-reply-to: <200801020445.m024jWU2008538@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:45:31 -0800) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85974 Archived-At: I would go one step further: vc-dired should not be based on dired at all. 99% of the dired key bindings and functionality are not useful in vc-dired. Unifying them is a big advantag There may be reasons to separate them which outweigh the advantage of unification, but we should see them presented and weigh them before going in that direction.