From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: question about testing for toolkit
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:27 -0500
Message-ID: <E1J976x-0003wE-6B@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DHEEKFAFJEFOJHLCFPFDIEEGCDAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199055691 18373 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2007 23:01:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 31 00:01:36 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1J97A0-0003QR-9r
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:01:36 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J979e-0005Dn-Vy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:01:15 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J9770-0002dX-RW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:30 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J976z-0002bU-3v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:30 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J976y-0002bI-QB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:28 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1J976y-0007NW-Cw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:28 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1J976x-0003wE-6B; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <DHEEKFAFJEFOJHLCFPFDIEEGCDAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85712
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/85712>

    Which of the following would be a suitable test to determine whether the
    menu-bar is treated as ordinary text lines by `set-frame-size'?

    (and (not (eq system-type 'windows-nt)))
	 (not (featurep 'x-toolkit)))

I think that is the best one.  If a toolkit is used,
which toolkit does not matter.