From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-u prefix behavior of TAB broken Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:55:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <874peijnu4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <47667010.40209@gmx.at> <87tzmhs8g8.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4766C7F7.5060504@gmx.at> <87fxxvbnbv.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <476CD8CF.4060108@gmx.at> <476D8AEC.4050604@gmx.at> <476ED6A5.30707@gmx.at> <477033C3.2020002@gmx.at> <87lk7fq3u9.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1198850267 8037 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2007 13:57:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:57:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, miles@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 28 14:58:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J8Fip-0005Po-I4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:57:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J8FiU-00074d-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J8FgL-0006E3-U5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:55:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J8FgL-0006Dj-Ik for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J8FgL-0006Df-8S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J8FgK-0001Uv-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:55:24 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J8FgK-0002Mi-Eq; Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:55:24 -0500 In-reply-to: <87lk7fq3u9.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:19:02 +0200) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85547 Archived-At: > The function to check whether a command should operate on the region > instead of whatever it normally does is now called `use-region-p'. Perhaps a better function name could start with the `region-...' prefix for consistency with other related functions. That parallelism is desirable, but it is not the only factor in choosing a good name. The name `use-region-p' seems good to me, and I don't see a better one. Can you suggest another name that you think is better?