From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: M-x comment-region
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:42 -0500
Message-ID: <E1J6BaM-0000hM-D1@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1198357857 31830 80.91.229.12 (22 Dec 2007 21:10:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:10:57 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 22 22:11:10 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1J6Bcg-0005nK-FR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:11:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J6BcM-00013P-71
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:10:46 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J6BaQ-0007UE-Tr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:46 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J6BaN-0007P5-CU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:45 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J6BaN-0007Op-1Z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:43 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1J6BaM-0000wZ-L9; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:42 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1J6BaM-0000hM-D1; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:42 -0500
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85386
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/85386>

I think I fixed the problem.  M-x comment-region
for Lisp code should now use ;; if indenting a whole function
and ;;; if indenting just part of a function.
In the latter case there should be enough indentation after the ;;;
to prevent it from being treated as an outline header.

Does it work right, now?