From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: nxml-mode faces
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:28 -0500
Message-ID: <E1J4m08-0003dx-47@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <4767CFA3.10201@f2s.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1198021064 7610 80.91.229.12 (18 Dec 2007 23:37:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:37:44 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Jason Rumney <jasonr@f2s.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 19 00:37:55 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1J4m0X-00046N-2h
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:37:53 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J4m0D-0001lI-Md
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:33 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J4m0A-0001jx-Hp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:30 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J4m09-0001jg-5e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:30 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4m09-0001jc-0U
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:29 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1J4m08-0006e3-R5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:28 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1J4m08-0003dx-47; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:37:28 -0500
In-reply-to: <4767CFA3.10201@f2s.com> (message from Jason Rumney on Tue, 18
	Dec 2007 13:48:19 +0000)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85268
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/85268>

    Does anyone have any objection to the patch below, which makes use of
    existing font-lock faces rather than inventing an entirely separate
    color scheme?

On general principles, that's a change for the better.
But I don't know any details about this mode.