From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comment-add Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:00:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ir5zwu4j.fsf@escher.local.home> <87prynum2x.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <87sl2agwwz.fsf@member.fsf.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197399749 23805 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2007 19:02:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dto@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 20:02:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J2ANB-0002mT-Of for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:02:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2AMu-0000kk-49 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:02:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J2ALT-00082K-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:00:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J2ALS-00080G-7R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:00:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J2ALR-0007zy-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:00:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J2ALR-0001zw-JZ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:00:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J2ALR-0004Is-19; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:00:41 -0500 In-reply-to: <87sl2agwwz.fsf@member.fsf.org> (message from Tassilo Horn on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:41:16 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85058 Archived-At: If I comment text that starts at column 0 (a top-level sexp) like this ;;; (defun foo () ;;; (do-this) ;;; (do-that) ;;; (do-another-thing)) That text already consists of comments. To help me reproduce the problem, could you please post a *precise* test case for this bug? The test case should start with `emacs -q', so that your .emacs file does not affect it, and it should show exactly what text to put in the buffer, what commands to execute, and how and where to click. Also please say exactly what incorrect results you get.