From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fixing numerous `message' bugs.. Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:17:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87myso8yrs.fsf@marie.gnufans.net> <87ve7b4xt6.fsf@marie.gnufans.net> <85abonpxnw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197047939 9829 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2007 17:18:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: deego3@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 18:19:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0gqv-0000Qy-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:19:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0gqe-0007Py-SF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:18:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0gpu-0006cm-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0gpr-0006VL-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0gpr-0006V8-0a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:17:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0gpq-0000ab-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0gpq-0000No-Es; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:17:58 -0500 In-reply-to: <85abonpxnw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:58:59 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84832 Archived-At: +++ b/lisp/textmodes/artist.el @@ -1151,14 +1151,14 @@ PREV-OP-ARG are used when invoked recursively during the build-up." (interactive) (let ((next-op (cdr (cdr (assoc artist-curr-go artist-prev-next-op-alist))))) (artist-select-operation next-op) - (message next-op))) + (message (and next-op "%s") next-op))) I have a feeling that next-op is always supposed to be non-nil, and I think artist-select-operation will get en error if next-op is not nil. So I think the `and' is not needed. How about asking the `artist.el' maintainer?