From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: remember(-diary).el
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:48:30 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Iy92U-0000YG-MI@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <4743DD30.4010504@gmx.at> <buooddogijh.fsf@dhapc248.dev.necel.com>
	<4743EFE7.7080907@gmx.at> <E1Iv1me-0003mT-2n@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<8763zki775.fsf@grepfind.mwolson.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196441390 13329 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2007 16:49:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:49:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Michael Olson <mwolson@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 30 17:49:58 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Iy93Y-0003v7-KQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:49:36 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Iy93I-00028x-QM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:49:20 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Iy92X-0001gD-Ce
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:48:33 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Iy92W-0001fH-3n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:48:32 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iy92V-0001fB-QU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:48:31 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1Iy92V-0003Jf-Ow
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:48:31 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1Iy92U-0000YG-MI; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:48:30 -0500
In-reply-to: <8763zki775.fsf@grepfind.mwolson.org> (message from Michael Olson
	on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:22:06 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84367
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/84367>

    I would strongly prefer for the code to remain in a separate file, for
    the sake of modularity.

Modularity of design is no reason to keep it a separate file.
A piece of code can still be modular even if it is in the same file
with other code.

Is there any more specific issue of modularity at stake here?