From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A mistake?
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:04:32 -0500
Message-ID: <E1IuoJk-00076D-Vj@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <857ikgpnen.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<E1ItXIm-00083Z-1g@tucano.isti.cnr.it> <85y7cwo0lk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<E1IuVsu-00068D-QB@tucano.isti.cnr.it>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195646691 23644 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2007 12:04:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:04:51 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 21 13:04:57 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IuoK8-0001Aa-Br
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:04:56 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IuoJu-0006AB-0L
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:04:42 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IuoJo-00069O-Et
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:04:37 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IuoJm-00067z-4D
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:04:35 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuoJl-00067u-Pt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:04:33 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IuoJl-0008J1-Dj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:04:33 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IuoJk-00076D-Vj; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:04:32 -0500
In-reply-to: <E1IuVsu-00068D-QB@tucano.isti.cnr.it> (message from Francesco
	Potorti` on Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:23:36 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83775
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/83775>

    The trunk additionally uses the same defaults for ctags as for etags:
	    (main): Use the same defaults for ctags as for etags: find
	    typedefs, structure tags, macro constants, enum constants,
	    struct members and global variables.

    Does anyone have anything against this change being backported to the
    emacs 22 branch as well?

Please don't.  We hope to start pretest of Emacs 22.2 soon,
and this is not a bug fix.