From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francesco Potorti` Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A mistake? Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:23:36 +0100 Message-ID: References: <857ikgpnen.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85y7cwo0lk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195575898 7117 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2007 16:24:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 20 17:25:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IuVuB-0001Fd-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:24:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuVty-0007Cg-6p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:24:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuVtu-0007Bd-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuVtr-00079Q-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:24:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuVtr-00079N-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:24:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.isti.cnr.it ([194.119.192.4]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IuVto-0005xz-Cc; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:24:32 -0500 Original-Received: from conversionlocal.isti.cnr.it by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.3-x13 #31251) id <01MNYGMQ9NUOC3RJZX@mx.isti.cnr.it>; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:23:42 +0100 Original-Received: from tucano.isti.cnr.it (tucano.isti.cnr.it [146.48.81.102]) by mx.isti.cnr.it (PMDF V6.3-1 #31408) with ESMTPSA id <01MNYGMMJKQ2BL2FO6@mx.isti.cnr.it>; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:23:37 +0100 Original-Received: from pot by tucano.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IuVsu-00068D-QB; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:23:36 +0100 In-reply-to: <85y7cwo0lk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-INSM-ip-source: 146.48.81.102 Auth Done X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: OpenVMS 7.2 (Multinet 4.3-4.4 stack) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83722 Archived-At: >Commit to the emacs_22 branch and wait for Miles to merge it to the >trunk. Presumably you'd do something like > >cvs checkout EMACS_22_BASE . > >or what it was called, from the top directory, and then edit and commit >in the resulting tree. Done, thank you. I backported bug corrections for etags to the emacs 22 branch. The trunk additionally uses the same defaults for ctags as for etags: (main): Use the same defaults for ctags as for etags: find typedefs, structure tags, macro constants, enum constants, struct members and global variables. Does anyone have anything against this change being backported to the emacs 22 branch as well?