From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: parallel bootstrap failure; _prompt_? during bootstrap build Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:33 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fxz6fmt7.fsf@rho.meyering.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195560842 15656 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2007 12:14:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 20 13:14:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IuRzT-0006st-Q5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:14:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuRzF-0005gM-UV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:13:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuRy0-0004EH-0b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuRxy-0004DM-KW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuRxy-0004D9-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IuRxy-0007aj-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IuRxx-0004JL-D2; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:33 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:21:39 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83711 Archived-At: > When Emacs reads input in batch mode, does it do this decoding at all? > I don't know. But since the input is coming from stdin, not from "the > keyboard", I think it is wrong to do any such decoding. I don't see why it would be wrong. It would be wrong to do terminal-escape-sequence processing, but coding-system decoding on the contrary seems like the right thing to do. Could you explain the arguments for this?