From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:06:56 -0500
Message-ID: <E1IsV4C-0004CV-Np@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <udejeysyvn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1IquXm-0000PY-M9@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<gid4uhlh75.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1IrIZ5-0002Bq-LB@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ah8x52wzcd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1Is1yM-0008HX-28@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvr6itkgc4.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195096030 31722 80.91.229.12 (15 Nov 2007 03:07:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:07:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 15 04:07:14 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IsV4U-0007aa-AA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:07:14 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IsV4H-0002kJ-Jr
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:01 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IsV4E-0002jc-UA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:06:58 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IsV4D-0002iq-Gt
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:06:58 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsV4D-0002il-E5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:06:57 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IsV4D-00060e-11
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:06:57 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IsV4C-0004CV-Np; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:06:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <jwvr6itkgc4.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:05:18 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83230
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/83230>

    I agree it should be a macro (with an empty body), but I think that
    having the arglist as a single arg is better because it makes it
    syntactically idential to the arglist in the function definition.

To me, the fact that there is no body makes that extra level of parens
seem like unnecessary clutter.  But I won't put up a fight about the
question.