From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: recenter-top-bottom
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:59:45 -0500
Message-ID: <E1IrSKn-0002SM-6N@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BNELLINCGFJLDJIKDGACCELFCEAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194847503 8086 80.91.229.12 (12 Nov 2007 06:05:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 06:05:03 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: alan.mackenzie_jwa@nxp.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 12 07:05:05 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IrSPr-0003SE-MN
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:04:59 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IrSPf-0005uv-Gi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:04:47 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IrSKq-0002Fe-W0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:59:49 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IrSKp-0002Dz-8T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:59:48 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrSKo-0002Dp-UP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:59:46 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IrSKo-00044s-E0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:59:46 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IrSKn-0002SM-6N; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:59:45 -0500
In-reply-to: <BNELLINCGFJLDJIKDGACCELFCEAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83024
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/83024>

    1. The current window line determines the destination: If within the top
    third, move to window bottom. If within the middle third, move to top. If
    within the bottom third, move to center.

That is clever, but it has the bad effect of altering the behavior
of a single C-l.  The virtue of your previous idea is that it
only alters the effect of repeated C-l.

So I think your first suggestion is better, and I am still thinking
of maybe installing it.

If people are very enthusiastic about your second suggestion,
I will say yes to it.