From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: TAGS buffer generates spurious undo warnings
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:07:00 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Inlw4-0000xy-Db@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <wo4pg5u54i.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193969382 24588 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2007 02:09:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 02:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jfinder@crypticstudios.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 02 03:09:44 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Inlyc-0002V5-CI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:09:38 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1InlyS-0006wX-8T
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:09:28 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Inlw6-0003Wd-Jj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:07:02 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Inlw5-0003VA-Ht
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:07:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Inlw5-0003Uk-8z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:07:01 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1Inlw4-0000Ze-UJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:07:00 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1Inlw4-0000xy-Db; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:07:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <wo4pg5u54i.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:39:57 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82338
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/82338>

I see no reason to keep undo enabled in tags table buffers,
so let's just disable it (in Emacs 22).  Then we don't have to
spend any more time on this.