From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: region-active-p Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:08:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <85hck5voi1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193997631 21069 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2007 10:00:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc, andreas.roehler@online.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk, stephen@xemacs.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 02 11:00:31 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IntKA-0007xE-Sv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:00:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IntK0-0002Yv-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:00:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Inj96-0005vl-8v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Inj94-0005s3-OL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:08:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Inj94-0005rr-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Inj94-0004Xp-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Inj92-0007sH-Py; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:08:12 -0400 In-reply-to: <85hck5voi1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:56:06 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:00:07 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82346 Archived-At: What about region-given-p or region-specified-p or region-selected-p? Those talk more specifically about the preexisting situation rather than about the action to be taken. And they are partly inaccurate about what they say about the situation. For that reason I don't like them.