From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New keybinding suggestion: C-x _ for `shrink-window' Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:04:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r6jfed61.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877il3qyvs.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193943986 9500 80.91.229.12 (1 Nov 2007 19:06:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@altern.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 01 20:06:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1InfN0-00009s-JQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 20:06:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InfMq-0006ML-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InfLW-0004TJ-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:04:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1InfLV-0004RQ-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InfLV-0004Qo-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:04:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1InfLT-0001Dq-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:04:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1InfLT-0001LN-8L; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:04:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82308 Archived-At: I'm not so sure. "n"arrow or "w"iden are independent of whether the window is going to be sized by its left or right border, while "->" or "<-" would depend on it. In other words, "n" and "w" are window-centric, while the cursor keys would be border-centric. It does not seem like a problem to me. > / and \ could be good for vertical size changes > and [,] for horizontal; they don't need a shift key. / is S-7 and \ is AltGr-º in a Spanish keyboard... You can't please everybody.