From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: desupporting X10 and old X11 releases (was: Re: isearch multiple buffers) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:21:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87odfcggvl.fsf@jurta.org> <87hckk9uoa.fsf@jurta.org> <87abqcrq9p.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <471BE5D3.3050007@gmail.com> <87y7dwq7x9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87odepv21n.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ir4wjcev.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <200710261516.l9QFGQ7C001069@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710261941.l9QJfcH0010503@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710271728.l9RHSk8B019811@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710281645.l9SGjEO7024789@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193649963 14607 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2007 09:26:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:26:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 29 10:26:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ImQsj-0006Ku-KO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:26:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImQsa-0001Tb-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:25:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImQoc-0006Kg-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:21:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImQob-0006I4-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:21:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImQoa-0006Hw-UB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:21:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImQoa-0007cZ-Fb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:21:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImQoZ-0000YG-Io; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:21:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <200710281645.l9SGjEO7024789@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:45:14 -0700) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82048 Archived-At: > There are still conditionals for X11R3 (testing HAVE_X11R4). That > must be long obsolete. We can delete them if that would save us any > trouble. It will allow us to get rid of some code in xterm.[ch] and xfns.c, so it seems worth doing. How about X11R4, is that still worth supporting? I don't think so. But let's ask about that along with the other questions.