From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: region-active-p Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:10:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200710191149.59775.andreas.roehler@online.de> <200710231053.28105.andreas.roehler@online.de> <200710240933.40308.andreas.roehler@online.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193278403 30746 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2007 02:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:13:23 +0000 (UTC) To: juri@jurta.org, miles@gnu.org, stephen@xemacs.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 25 04:13:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IksDp-00032w-0s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:13:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IksDg-0008TP-Ki for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IksBK-00064q-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IksBK-000646-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IksBJ-00063q-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:10:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IksBJ-0003JU-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:10:45 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IksBJ-0004wR-48; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:10:45 -0400 In-reply-to: <200710240933.40308.andreas.roehler@online.de> (message from Andreas =?iso-8859-15?q?R=F6hler?= on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:33:38 +0200) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81677 Archived-At: I cannot understand what Andreas Roehler is trying to say. Can someone else answer my question? > When commands in XEmacs call this, do they also test > for a nonempty region? Or do they operate on the region > when it is empty?