From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: doc-view compilation warnings Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:33:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wsth6vk5.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878x5wrgnv.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <87prz6yn1c.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <200710231430.l9NEUk8x012690@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <87ejflzv18.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <200710231607.l9NG7EoD016139@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <87abq9zpnz.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <200710231835.l9NIZ7HB025212@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <87640xzn9p.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <871wblzjn3.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193215026 8451 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2007 08:37:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 24 10:37:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ikbjd-0008HA-QL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:37:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkbjV-0004Yo-J3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ikbfq-00036m-L7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:33:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ikbfp-00035b-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:33:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ikbfo-00035D-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ikbfj-000146-9S; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ikbfi-0003Yu-TG; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 04:33:02 -0400 In-reply-to: <871wblzjn3.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> (message from Tassilo Horn on Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:00:16 +0200) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81638 Archived-At: That would load doc-view unconditionally when a user opens a pdf/ps/dvi file. That's ok with me, but others might think different. But someone should decide: Is loading doc-view when opening ps/pdf/dvi files ok? For opening pdf/dvi files, we want themto use doc-view by default. For PS files, we don't want doc-view to be the default mode choice, but it is ok if visiting a PS file loads doc-view.