From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fill-paragraph-or-region Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:40:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192772651 31057 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2007 05:44:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 07:44:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IikeZ-0001K7-E6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:44:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IikeS-0008LS-2S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IikbE-0006Wl-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:40:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IikbC-0006W3-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:40:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IikbC-0006Vy-Ox for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:40:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IikbC-0002dM-HI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:40:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IikbC-00006P-6r; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 01:40:42 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:04:08 -0400) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81190 Archived-At: It seems like a bad idea to me: fill-paragraph is already complex enough: what's the benefit of conflating the two? The benefit is to keep `fill-paragraph' as the name of the command that M-q runs. That name is better even though it now has the feature of doing something different for certain interactive calls. The complexity added to `fill-paragraph' is a handful of lines. Not significant.