From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: verilog-mode.el
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:36:51 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IhEt1-0001f1-ES@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <47111236.5020402@verilog.com>
	<jwvfy0e30i7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192412345 28094 80.91.229.12 (15 Oct 2007 01:39:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: wsnyder@wsnyder.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	mac@brushroad.com
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 15 03:38:55 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IhEux-0006XC-RA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 03:38:52 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhEur-00089J-70
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:38:45 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhEt6-0006R5-EG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:36:56 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IhEt4-0006Py-Eh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:36:55 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhEt4-0006Pr-4m
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:36:54 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IhEt3-0007fy-Sc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:36:53 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IhEt1-0001f1-ES; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:36:51 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvfy0e30i7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:41:15 -0400)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80885
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/80885>

    - Emacs-21's comment-region and uncomment-region should work correctly
      (including mangling nested comments, although in a different way from the
      one you chose).

Is that a suggestion for them to change something?  Or is it a
statement that something is good does not need to be changed?  Both
meanings seem plausible.  But I cnnot tell what the something is,
in regard to verilog-mode.el.