From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:59:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <861wl5q7al.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <54853.128.165.123.18.1192027947.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <55463.128.165.123.18.1192035787.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <55585.128.165.123.18.1192038971.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <858x6atas5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1192205895 15395 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2007 16:18:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 12 18:18:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IgMzR-0001jQ-C4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:03:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgMzL-0004Xh-DK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:03:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IgMv6-0002qn-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:59:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IgMv4-0002oZ-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgMv3-0002oB-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IgMv3-0000Yf-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:59:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IgMv2-0001Be-Is; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:59:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80721 Archived-At: So, let's just add something like the following trivial patch, which just adds a new FEATURE-unload-function hook and leaves the old FEATURE-unload-hook untouched (and undocumented). If we are not going to change the meaning of FEATURE-unload-hook, then rather than create a second similar feature, I would rather move the normal handling into a function that the hooks can call.