From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: M-q when the region is active (Re: TAB when the region is active) Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:54:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sl54hnhw.fsf@jurta.org> <87tzpdysa9.fsf_-_@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191156994 12445 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2007 12:56:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 14:56:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IbyLV-0002sJ-3q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:56:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbyLR-0007ns-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IbyKo-0007Mx-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IbyKm-0007Kz-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:55:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IbyKm-0007Kl-Ep for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:55:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IbyKm-0000yl-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:55:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IbyJz-0005DH-2X; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:54:55 -0400 In-reply-to: <87tzpdysa9.fsf_-_@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:18:38 +0300) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80052 Archived-At: Is this a good enough reason to use `fill-region' on the active region, and not other fill-related functions, for the sake of compatibility? I think it is the right decision, even aside from compatibility. Would someone please do this in the trunk?