From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Splitting gnus.texi
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:29:55 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IaZlr-0003d3-PQ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1IPj9V-0003Yo-MM@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<mxejhjdrqs.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1IRYNh-0003dG-Sc@fencepost.gnu.org> <jer6lh2f4e.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
	<E1ISGc3-000624-G9@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<izlkbnk2us.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87fy1v36be.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <u3axvv8rp.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1ISbWd-00074O-HB@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fy1ut4hp.fsf@jurta.org>
	<v9y7ewrnuq.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
	<E1Ia7tz-0003GO-0V@fencepost.gnu.org> <m3d4w6z2ro.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190824315 7307 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2007 16:31:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:31:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 18:31:49 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IaZnc-00067P-Vd
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:31:45 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IaZnZ-0000Xt-S3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:31:41 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IaZmb-0007if-9I
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:30:41 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IaZmZ-0007gD-PH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:30:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaZmZ-0007fv-G1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:30:39 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IaZmY-0002xy-T7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:30:39 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IaZlr-0003d3-PQ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:29:55 -0400
In-reply-to: <m3d4w6z2ro.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Jay Belanger on Tue, 25
	Sep 2007 19:30:51 -0500)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79920
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/79920>

    > It would be good to split gnus.texi into 10 to 15 files
    > just because it is so big.  Similar for calc.texi.

    Should they then get their own (sub)directories?

On reflection, I think they should.  There is a certain amount of
disadvantage to each added subdir of `lisp', but no such disadvantage
attaches to added subdirs of `doc'.