From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: TAB for non-editing modes
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:20:02 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IZsXK-00029m-RT@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200709220118.l8M1IZkd009116@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
	<E1IZ7D3-0000ol-9H@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200709221635.l8MGZUdZ007370@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
	<E1IZT0y-0002It-PG@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200709240056.l8O0uRae017924@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190658421 8304 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2007 18:27:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:27:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 24 20:26:56 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IZsdz-0000if-HT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:26:55 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IZsdw-0007aX-Ur
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:26:52 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IZsY1-00032a-Az
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:20:45 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IZsY0-00031U-E2
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:20:44 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IZsY0-000312-0c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:20:44 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IZsXz-0003Oi-Ee
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:20:43 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IZsXK-00029m-RT; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:20:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <200709240056.l8O0uRae017924@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message
	from Dan Nicolaescu on Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:56:27 -0700)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79738
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/79738>

	    dired-next-line
	    dired-next-dirline
	    dired-next-subdir
	    dired-next-marked-file

    Which one do you think would be the best to bind to TAB? Can you see a
    better binding?

I think we should not define TAB in Dired mode
until we have a better reason to do so.