From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: un-deprecating CL Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:32:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <864phxjj03.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> <87hclx834d.fsf@red-bean.com> <86ps0jiwfm.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> <18156.13696.753467.452116@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190414099 8838 80.91.229.12 (21 Sep 2007 22:34:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, bojohan+news@dd.chalmers.se To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 22 00:34:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IYr5I-0002pY-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:34:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYr5G-0004xO-Kx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:34:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IYr45-0003vO-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IYr44-0003tL-15 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IYr43-0003t8-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IYr43-0004P5-EL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IYr3S-0006Kd-Fr; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:32:58 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:37:32 -0400) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79468 Archived-At: > As for mapcar, it is pretty slow already, and the main cost is in > calling the user's function. That won't get any slower. Then again: how many uses of mapcar* have you encountered? If you object to `union' because it's not used often, I'd expect you to reject the vararg version of mapcar. The issues are not similar. One is adding a new function. The other is a simple, natural extension in an existing function. The former costs more, in complexity.