From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: un-deprecating CL
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:34:26 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IXiq2-0006Sk-UK@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <864phxjj03.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk>
	<87hclx834d.fsf@red-bean.com>	<uodg4jr3j.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1IWc2Z-0007VE-73@fencepost.gnu.org>	<86ps0jiwfm.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk>
	<E1IX4MV-0006uz-Ep@fencepost.gnu.org>	<86k5qqgh9y.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk>
	<E1IXIuY-0002Dh-V2@fencepost.gnu.org>	<m3d4whcjem.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1IXTmb-0007kp-VE@fencepost.gnu.org> <46EF7F3E.8070107@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190144214 24357 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2007 19:36:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:36:54 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dto@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 21:36:47 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IXisJ-0003XI-4N
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 21:36:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IXisH-0006DZ-B1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:36:45 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IXiqc-000560-FU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:35:02 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IXiqa-00054J-V0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:35:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXiqa-000545-De
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:35:00 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IXiqa-0000ok-5t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:35:00 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IXiq2-0006Sk-UK; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:34:26 -0400
In-reply-to: <46EF7F3E.8070107@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79218
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/79218>

    If the keyword argument handling is broken out and generalized will it 
    still add much complexity?

The complexity that bothers me is the complexity of the programming
interface.  This is not about implementation.