From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [dmantipov@yandex.ru: Re: Your Emacs changes]
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:20:25 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IX4Lh-0006m1-SR@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1IQeG2-0005Xq-LP@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<v1tzqgjtl1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <67d4ww4ayj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<nebqc3pbxm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189988520 17025 80.91.229.12 (17 Sep 2007 00:22:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:22:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 17 02:21:58 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IX4NB-0006JB-S9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 02:21:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IX4NA-00074Y-Hf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:21:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IX4MF-0006bL-RN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:20:59 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IX4MD-0006aK-UF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:20:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IX4MD-0006aC-OC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:20:57 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IX4MD-0002KF-DF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:20:57 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IX4Lh-0006m1-SR; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:20:25 -0400
In-reply-to: <nebqc3pbxm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:43:33 -0400)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79057
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/79057>

    Since the original author apparently can't be bothered, can anyone
    else write a ChangeLog entry for this? Though I'm not really sure it
    should be installed under these grounds...

What is the uncertainty?  We have the legal papers.  If the change is
useful, why not install it?