From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: TAB when the region is active
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:02 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IWmmc-0007k5-FJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200709142159.l8ELxFpE029330@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189921107 20049 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2007 05:38:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:38:27 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 16 07:38:25 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IWmpt-0000aU-04
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:38:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IWmpr-00062R-Vy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:38:24 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IWmn7-0004oi-VO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:34 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IWmn7-0004nQ-3G
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:33 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWmn6-0004nB-KX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:32 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IWmn6-0001Ti-Em
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:32 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IWmmc-0007k5-FJ; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <200709142159.l8ELxFpE029330@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (message
	from Dan Nicolaescu on Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:59:15 -0700)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79017
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/79017>

    Similarly, wouldn't it be better if TAB would run indent-region if the
    region is active? 

The idea is logical, but we need to ask users if they find the change
annoying.