From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; frozen frame after C-x 5 0 Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:52:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87abs0mfxy.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <200709100154.l8A1sDjg008278@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <46E55679.1050602@swipnet.se> <46E63242.1020508@swipnet.se> <864pi0xnhv.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189623309 21221 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2007 18:55:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, sdl.web@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 12 20:55:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVXMZ-0002eV-1u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:54:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVXMY-0003Oh-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:54:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVXKi-0001Ll-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVXKh-0001K8-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVXKh-0001K2-BI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVXKh-0004qO-1w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVXK9-0005Qq-1r; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:52:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <864pi0xnhv.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:05:16 +0200) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78702 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:19863 Archived-At: > Maybe it didn't find that version of GTK+ attractive enough. Perhaps > it would mate with a younger GTK version if given the chance. I should think that 2.10.14 would be quite below the age of consent already. Program versions' lifespans are much shorter than ours. You have to measure their lives in program-years, which are about a week.