From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs 22.1 on hp-ux 11.11 core dumps when DISPLAY not set Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:01:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1B2B2EF98D55CB41BD16F13B18B9B0080303EEB4@FFBRUE001.cfmu.corp.eurocontrol.int> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189236989 3727 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2007 07:36:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 07:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: philippe.waroquiers@eurocontrol.int, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 08 09:36:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITurl-00019g-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:36:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITurj-00022z-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:36:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITupe-000195-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:34:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITupc-00017P-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITupb-00017E-UB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITupb-000452-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITuJk-0003OO-Mp; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 03:01:20 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:05:26 -0400) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78227 Archived-At: I really meant: if they are explicitly initialized and never change, is there any need to move them to file scope? In that case, they don't actually have to _be_ static, AFAICS, so it's no problem if the HPUX stuff defines "static" as a no-op. If they don't need to be static, it is ok to delete `static'. But please don't leave them file-scope static. That is asking for confusion.