From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?) Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:30:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86k5re4blv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291531.l7TFVnlD010335@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86fy224aah.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86bqcq4a4q.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291604.l7TG4atk011108@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <867ine492x.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <863ay24826.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291641.l7TGfo2t012413@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708310812.l7V8Cgq9022040@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86lkbnygii.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <46DC1EF6.1040002@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189146696 9501 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2007 06:31:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yavor@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 08:31:37 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITXNP-0002Zm-G7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:31:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXNN-0007J0-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:31:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXMr-00070S-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXMq-0006yT-AH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXMq-0006yH-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITXMp-0006so-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITXMW-0002bo-OQ; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:30:40 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Thu, 06 Sep 2007 08:58:17 +0900) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78077 Archived-At: The Carbon+AppKit port is not strictly a new port, but can be seen as a variant of the Carbon port. That's one of the reasons I put such a name. The Carbon+AppKit port provides the same feature sets and shares most of the code with the existing Carbon port. If we install this, would we do so by changing the existing Carbon port? That might be something we could put into a 22.3 or 22.4 release if Emacs 23 is not going to be as soon as we hope. It depends on how simple and safe the changes are.