From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: callback functions in Emacs
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:56 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IT9TA-00051r-Py@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87642qmb0g.fsf@gmx.de> <m2d4wxi0rk.fsf@cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189055410 27208 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2007 05:10:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:10:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 07:10:10 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IT9d1-0008Fx-4o
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:10:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IT9cz-0005GC-EQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:10:05 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IT9Tk-0004c4-D3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:00:32 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IT9Te-0004VT-K0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:00:30 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9Te-0004Tg-8p
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:00:26 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IT9Ta-0004iG-LX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:00:24 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IT9TA-00051r-Py; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <m2d4wxi0rk.fsf@cam.ac.uk> (message from Leo on Wed, 05 Sep 2007
	16:34:55 +0100)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77932
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/77932>

    I wonder the if it is now time to include the "dynamically loadable
    extension modules" patch.

I am still looking at the legal implications of it.
I have not decided whether we should ever install it.