From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?) Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86k5re4blv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291531.l7TFVnlD010335@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86fy224aah.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86bqcq4a4q.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291604.l7TG4atk011108@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <867ine492x.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <863ay24826.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291641.l7TGfo2t012413@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708310812.l7V8Cgq9022040@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86lkbnygii.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <46DC1EF6.1040002@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189023046 13042 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2007 20:10:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yavor@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 22:10:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IT1Cs-00022J-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:10:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT1Cq-0000Ac-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:10:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT15f-0006tV-Ik for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT15e-0006s5-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT15e-0006r6-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT15d-0007gA-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT15L-00068s-VW; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:24:17 +0900) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77902 Archived-At: > A port that supports GNUstep is much better than one which doesn't. > So unless we want to support both, we should prefer the Cocoa/GNUstep > port. They would not conflict/compete with each other at least immediately. The former targets Emacs 22, and the latter Emacs 23. I have lost you -- which one is "former" and which one is "latter"? Any new port could only be considered for Emacs 23. So if one is aimed at Emacs 22, it would need to be upgraded to 23.