From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: angeli@caeruleus.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Split man directory
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:45:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ISbWd-00074O-HB@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <u3axvv8rp.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:39:06 +0300)
Indeed. But instead of `man', why not use the GNU-standard `doc'?
Thus, we will have
doc/emacs
doc/lispref
doc/lispintro
doc/contrib (for other manuals)
This is fine with me (I agree with the person who said `misc' is better
than `contrib').
I just wonder whether the added cleanness of creating a directory to
hold these four dirs outweights the disadvantage of moving them down
one level. If there were many of them, such as 8, then it would be
clearly yes. With just 4, it might be more annoyance than it is worth.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-04 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1IPj9V-0003Yo-MM@fencepost.gnu.org>
2007-09-01 2:49 ` Split man directory Glenn Morris
2007-09-01 6:03 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-02 15:50 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-02 15:57 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-03 18:25 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-03 18:39 ` Glenn Morris
2007-09-04 16:45 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-01 8:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-01 19:11 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-01 19:47 ` Glenn Morris
2007-09-02 16:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-09-03 18:25 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-03 18:42 ` Glenn Morris
2007-09-03 19:19 ` Ralf Angeli
2007-09-03 19:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-03 20:04 ` Leo
2007-09-03 21:32 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-04 12:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-09-04 12:25 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-04 13:43 ` Stephen Berman
2007-09-04 22:58 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-04 13:46 ` Miles Bader
2007-09-04 16:45 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2007-09-04 23:06 ` Juri Linkov
2007-09-05 20:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-24 17:10 ` Splitting gnus.texi (was: Split man directory) Reiner Steib
2007-09-25 10:44 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-26 0:23 ` Splitting gnus.texi Katsumi Yamaoka
2007-09-26 6:07 ` Reiner Steib
2007-09-30 20:50 ` Giorgos Keramidas
2007-09-30 21:34 ` Reiner Steib
2007-09-30 21:46 ` Giorgos Keramidas
2007-09-26 8:55 ` Juri Linkov
2007-09-26 18:14 ` Directory doc/gnus in Emacs CVS (was: Splitting gnus.texi) Reiner Steib
2007-10-20 22:33 ` Directory doc/gnus in Emacs CVS Bill Wohler
2007-10-21 9:37 ` Reiner Steib
2007-10-21 16:26 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-26 0:30 ` Splitting gnus.texi Jay Belanger
2007-09-26 16:29 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-05 9:27 ` Split man directory Kim F. Storm
2007-09-05 10:10 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-05 11:57 ` Miles Bader
2007-09-06 4:59 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-06 5:23 ` Glenn Morris
2007-09-08 10:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-09-04 16:45 ` Richard Stallman
2007-09-04 17:57 ` Ralf Angeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1ISbWd-00074O-HB@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=angeli@caeruleus.net \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.