From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Change in emacsclient behavior
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:21:21 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IRB7R-0006IA-NB@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BNELLINCGFJLDJIKDGACMEPCCBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188584587 25364 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2007 18:23:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:23:07 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 31 20:23:06 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IRB96-0002yu-NK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:23:04 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IRB96-0004Xo-0X
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:23:04 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IRB7e-0003qz-03
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:21:34 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IRB7c-0003qM-Mk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:21:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRB7c-0003qA-J0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:21:32 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IRB7c-0003VU-Bn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:21:32 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IRB7R-0006IA-NB; Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:21:21 -0400
In-reply-to: <BNELLINCGFJLDJIKDGACMEPCCBAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77500
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/77500>

    `special-display-regexps' and `special-display-buffer-names' can also
    indicate a user wish for a separate frame. If a file name matches one of
    these, then perhaps emacslient should use a separate frame. (I don't know
    whether that already happens.)

I think those will take effect anyway, right?
If not, I agree it could make sense to check them.