From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merging etc Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:06:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200708211523.l7LFNnVl000876@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708220820.l7M8KbIt026014@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188014833 22485 80.91.229.12 (25 Aug 2007 04:07:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 04:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, miles@gnu.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, karoly@lorentey.hu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 25 06:07:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IOmvV-0000T2-Ti for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:07:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IOmvV-00016L-Dt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOmvP-000147-MF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOmvP-00013c-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IOmvO-00013V-U4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IOmvN-00078x-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IOmvK-0001jq-VA; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:06:58 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:39:50 -0400) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77113 Archived-At: I tend to believe the opposite: the description of small changes are easier to understand than description of combined changes. The usual simplification is to replace * foo.c (fooo_bar): Call mumble. ... * foo.c (fooo_bar): New function with * foo.c (fooo_bar): New function since (from the point of view of the trunk) the whole thing is new.