From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: merging etc Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:58:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200708211523.l7LFNnVl000876@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708220820.l7M8KbIt026014@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187902807 4983 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2007 21:00:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, karoly@lorentey.hu, miles@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 23 23:00:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IOJmf-0004tW-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:00:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IOJmf-0001SY-5r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOJlO-0000vz-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOJlM-0000v8-Uc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IOJlM-0000v2-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:58:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IOJlM-0006kW-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:58:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IOJlK-0003iP-T5; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:58:42 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:33:59 -0400) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77054 Archived-At: > That seems like a daunting task given the size of the logs though... I actually would rather keep the whole uncrunched text. I know it can be found on the branch, but if we insist on putting more than just "merge from branch", then we may as well keep it all. Not crunching changelog makes for a lot more work understanding it in the future. But I don't insist that it be crunched "perfectly". Just to the extent that it makes the text simpler.