From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [svenjoac@gmx.de: WoMan chokes on some manpages: Invalid
 search bound (wrong side of point)]
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:32:25 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ILplJ-0002dQ-2T@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1IIvYg-0005Va-OC@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<85tzr9o896.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187310688 26399 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2007 00:31:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:31:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: svenjoac@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 17 02:31:25 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ILpkG-00079C-IQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 02:31:20 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILpkG-0005RQ-4d
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:31:20 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILphk-0003rJ-KY
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:44 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ILphi-0003qQ-TP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:44 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILphi-0003qL-Og
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:42 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1ILphi-0003PO-I1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:42 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1ILplJ-0002dQ-2T; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:32:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <85tzr9o896.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup
	on Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:35:01 +0200)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76658
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/76658>

[I sent this message a week ago but did not get a response.]

    Shouldn't search-forward and re-search-forward in the case of a
    backlaying limit and "no-error" set just quietly return?

I'd rather not open an issue like that just to fix a local bug.  Would
someone please fix the bug by changing woman.el, then ack?