From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How are Windows users supposed to print the PostScript refcards? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:32:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <873aysl28i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87myx0z2ht.fsf@lrde.org> <87odhcfexo.fsf@lrde.org> <87d4xrg0sz.fsf@lrde.org> <874pizdccu.fsf@lrde.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187310617 26257 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2007 00:30:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: michael@cadilhac.name (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 17 02:30:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILpjC-0006vD-Nc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 02:30:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILpjC-0004kn-9S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILphW-0003kr-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILphV-0003kC-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILphU-0003k7-Ou for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILphU-0003L9-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILpl4-0002bD-Ci; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:32:10 -0400 In-reply-to: <874pizdccu.fsf@lrde.org> (michael@cadilhac.name) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76656 Archived-At: Sorry, I have no opinion about this. I don't know a lot about support for PS or PDF on various systems. I suggest this heuristic: if neither one of the formats has a clear advantage in portability, pick the one that is most convenient on GNU/Linux.