From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: info/ directory in CVS
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:38:27 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IGnzf-0001ti-E7@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <13lkcvcgr5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <u4pjid3s8.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jwvwswdzyud.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186112221 9499 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2007 03:37:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 03:37:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 05:36:59 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IGnyF-0007Mx-61
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 05:36:59 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IGnyE-0003qb-PR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:36:58 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IGnxJ-00030f-Gs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:36:01 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IGnxH-000300-Tn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:36:01 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGnxH-0002zt-NL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:35:59 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IGnxH-0008Ro-G4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:35:59 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IGnzf-0001ti-E7; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 23:38:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvwswdzyud.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:27:42 -0400)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75981
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/75981>

    I hope someday we can fix this limitation so that `dir' can really be
    auto-generated.

That requires some other way to specify the right order of manuals.
What could it be?

We could let each manual specify a priority.  I hope that each program
won't specify the highest possible.