From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Why emacs have not native language menu Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:27:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <46A49912.9030203@luxdo.jp> <877ioqdoq9.fsf@voyager.informatimago.com> <87hcnuc6hz.fsf@voyager.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185294409 6326 80.91.229.12 (24 Jul 2007 16:26:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:26:49 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 24 18:26:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDNDg-0006Xx-2g for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:26:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNDf-000472-Hk for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:26:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNDI-0003zW-GI for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNDH-0003z5-US for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IDNDH-0003ys-Ns for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IDNDH-0005BV-Gn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IDNEr-0001u1-06 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:27:57 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Jean-Christophe Helary on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:12:41 +0900) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:45983 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:12:41 +0900 > > On 24 juil. 07, at 23:58, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > So a clean separation between translatable strings and untranslatable > > code symbols is much harder than in C or Pascal, for example. > > Do you think such clear separation has to be attained to create a > localization system for emacs ? No, I just meant to cool some heads who evidently think that localizing Emacs is no different from localizing GCC, say.