From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: --eval
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:37:40 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ICgJI-0005mW-Rk@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <86myxs8rl4.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
	<jwvtzs02tsn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<86sl7k1djm.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87644dy5aj.fsf_-_@jurta.org>
	<851wf1sgmv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185129649 25809 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2007 18:40:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:40:49 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 22 20:40:47 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ICgMJ-0002hZ-8x
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:40:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ICgMI-00072z-TD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:40:46 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ICgHw-0004W2-A1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:36:16 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ICgHu-0004Td-A3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:36:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ICgHu-0004TW-4t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:36:14 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1ICgHt-0004o7-SM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:36:13 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1ICgJI-0005mW-Rk; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:37:40 -0400
In-reply-to: <851wf1sgmv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:26:00 +0200)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75315
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/75315>

    Deprecating -e is ok with me, but a potentially dangerous command may
    well be spelled explicitly.

I agree.  We do not need an abbreviation for --eval.