* [boyer@cs.utexas.edu: follow-mode arg should be optional]
@ 2007-07-18 4:42 Richard Stallman
2007-07-18 18:36 ` Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2007-07-18 4:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
[I sent this message a week ago but did not get a response.]
Would someone please fix this in Emacs 22 and the trunk,
then ack? (Please respond to him too--in general, when I
ask people to fix a bug, part of that should be to send a thanks
for the bug report.)
And please note his praise for all of us.
------- Start of forwarded message -------
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
autolearn=no version=3.1.0
From: Robert Boyer <boyer@cs.utexas.edu>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 04:52:59 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: follow-mode arg should be optional
In follow.el, we read:
(defun follow-mode (arg) ...
Maybe that arg should be &optional, so that it is
possible to put follow-mode in the first line of a
file, with, e.g.,
-*- mode: follow; -*-
As it is now, I believe a wrong-number-of-arguments
error arises when the code that parses such first lines
tries to execute (follow-mode). The error is masked to
some extent, but still shows up in a part of my screen.
Thanks so much for Emacs. What a wondrous system --
one of the real seven wonders of the world. Forced to
choose between Emacs and, say, any pyramid, I'd take
Emacs.
Bob
In GNU Emacs 21.2.1 (powerpc-apple-darwin, X toolkit)
of 2006-03-22 on kodaira.local
configured using `configure powerpc-apple-darwin
- --prefix=/sw --with-x --with-x-toolkit=lucid
- --without-toolkit-scroll-bars --without-gif
'--infodir=${prefix}/share/info'
'--mandir=${prefix}/share/man'
'--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib''
_______________________________________________
bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs
------- End of forwarded message -------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional
2007-07-18 4:42 [boyer@cs.utexas.edu: follow-mode arg should be optional] Richard Stallman
@ 2007-07-18 18:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-07-20 13:42 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-07-18 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rms; +Cc: emacs-devel
> [I sent this message a week ago but did not get a response.]
I responded to him directly even before you sent your first "reminder".
Please improve your system so as to detect those situations because they
tend to be rather frequent.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional
2007-07-18 18:36 ` Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-07-20 13:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-07-20 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2007-07-20 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
I responded to him directly even before you sent your first "reminder".
Please improve your system so as to detect those situations because they
tend to be rather frequent.
I don't think that is possible. How could a program tell that the
message you sent, which wasn't sent as a reply to mine, actually
responded to the issue? That would take real AI.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional
2007-07-20 13:42 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2007-07-20 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-07-21 16:54 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-07-20 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rms; +Cc: emacs-devel
> I don't think that is possible. How could a program tell that the
> message you sent, which wasn't sent as a reply to mine, actually
> responded to the issue? That would take real AI.
Well, your system could easily tell that it's a reply to *his* message.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional
2007-07-20 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-07-21 16:54 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2007-07-21 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel
> I don't think that is possible. How could a program tell that the
> message you sent, which wasn't sent as a reply to mine, actually
> responded to the issue? That would take real AI.
Well, your system could easily tell that it's a reply to *his* message.
It could tell that, but that doesn't mean it responds to what I asked
for in my message. It might have been a request for more information,
for instance.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-21 16:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-18 4:42 [boyer@cs.utexas.edu: follow-mode arg should be optional] Richard Stallman
2007-07-18 18:36 ` Fwd: follow-mode arg should be optional Stefan Monnier
2007-07-20 13:42 ` Richard Stallman
2007-07-20 16:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-07-21 16:54 ` Richard Stallman
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.