all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* [juri@jurta.org: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers]
@ 2007-07-16 15:50 Richard Stallman
  2007-07-16 16:11 ` Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2007-07-16 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

Would someone please DTRT, then ack?

------- Start of forwarded message -------
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 
	autolearn=failed version=3.1.0
To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
Organization: JURTA
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:08:44 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers

A recipe to reproduce this bug:

1. Run emacs -Q

2. M-: (get 'S-mouse-5 'event-symbol-elements) RET
(mouse-5 shift click)

3. Press the Shift key, and scroll the mouse wheel up/down.

4. M-: (get 'S-mouse-5 'event-symbol-elements) RET
(mouse-5 shift)

A list of modifiers now misses the `click' element that was here
initially.  As a result, mouse-avoidance-ignore-p fails to ignore
mouse wheel's scrolling events because it checks event-modifiers
for the `click' modifier.  The same bug applies to other modifiers
defined in `mouse-wheel-scroll-amount'.

GNU Emacs 22.1.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.10.12)

- -- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/


_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
------- End of forwarded message -------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers
  2007-07-16 15:50 [juri@jurta.org: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers] Richard Stallman
@ 2007-07-16 16:11 ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-07-16 20:55   ` Juri Linkov
  2007-07-17 15:05   ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-07-16 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rms; +Cc: emacs-devel

> Would someone please DTRT, then ack?

Please, Richard, don't do "forward", but "reply" instead.
Pretty please?


        Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers
  2007-07-16 16:11 ` Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-07-16 20:55   ` Juri Linkov
  2007-07-17 15:05     ` Richard Stallman
  2007-07-17 15:05   ` Richard Stallman
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Juri Linkov @ 2007-07-16 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: rms, emacs-devel

>> Would someone please DTRT, then ack?
>
> Please, Richard, don't do "forward", but "reply" instead.
> Pretty please?

What about a plan to redirect emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org to
emacs-devel@gnu.org?  Or should I report bugs to emacs-devel@gnu.org?

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers
  2007-07-16 20:55   ` Juri Linkov
@ 2007-07-17 15:05     ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2007-07-17 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juri Linkov; +Cc: monnier, emacs-devel

    What about a plan to redirect emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org to
    emacs-devel@gnu.org?  Or should I report bugs to emacs-devel@gnu.org?

The reason I send mail about the bug is to establish a reminder
in case nobody responds.  If you send a message to emacs-devel,
I still have to send my own message to establish the reminder.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers
  2007-07-16 16:11 ` Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers Stefan Monnier
  2007-07-16 20:55   ` Juri Linkov
@ 2007-07-17 15:05   ` Richard Stallman
  2007-07-17 16:42     ` Stefan Monnier
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2007-07-17 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel

    Please, Richard, don't do "forward", but "reply" instead.
    Pretty please?

I think it is better to use reply so as to save people the trouble of
looking for the data in another message.  But if people generally
agree that this doesn't help them, I don't mind using forward instead.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers
  2007-07-17 15:05   ` Richard Stallman
@ 2007-07-17 16:42     ` Stefan Monnier
  2007-07-18 20:54       ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2007-07-17 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rms; +Cc: emacs-devel

>     Please, Richard, don't do "forward", but "reply" instead.
>     Pretty please?

> I think it is better to use reply so as to save people the trouble of
> looking for the data in another message.  But if people generally
> agree that this doesn't help them, I don't mind using forward instead.

I think you meant it the other way around.  In any case, which command you
use actually doesn't matter so much.  I agree that it's good to keep a copy
of the original text, but that can be done with `reply' as well.
All I care about, really is that the "In-reply-to" (and/or the "References")
field in the header make it easy to recover the original.


        Stefan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers
  2007-07-17 16:42     ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2007-07-18 20:54       ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2007-07-18 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel

    > I think it is better to use reply so as to save people the trouble of
    > looking for the data in another message.  But if people generally
    > agree that this doesn't help them, I don't mind using forward instead.

    I think you meant it the other way around.

Yes, I did.

      In any case, which command you
    use actually doesn't matter so much.  I agree that it's good to keep a copy
    of the original text, but that can be done with `reply' as well.
    All I care about, really is that the "In-reply-to" (and/or the "References")
    field in the header make it easy to recover the original.

Ok, I will do it that way.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-18 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-16 15:50 [juri@jurta.org: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers] Richard Stallman
2007-07-16 16:11 ` Fwd: mouse-4/mouse-5 loses click modifiers Stefan Monnier
2007-07-16 20:55   ` Juri Linkov
2007-07-17 15:05     ` Richard Stallman
2007-07-17 15:05   ` Richard Stallman
2007-07-17 16:42     ` Stefan Monnier
2007-07-18 20:54       ` Richard Stallman

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.