From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Autoloading comment-forward
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:47:42 -0400
Message-ID: <E1I7HBu-00081w-79@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f6m4l8$i6i$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183841412 18583 80.91.229.12 (7 Jul 2007 20:50:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 20:50:12 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Ralf Angeli <angeli@caeruleus.net>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 07 22:50:11 2007
connect(): Connection refused
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1I7HEF-0001pk-RC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 22:50:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I7HEF-0005go-GJ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:50:07 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I7HBq-0004gH-3v
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:47:38 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I7HBo-0004ey-Hd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:47:37 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I7HBo-0004es-5z
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:47:36 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1I7HBn-00089A-Rk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:47:35 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1I7HBu-00081w-79; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 16:47:42 -0400
In-reply-to: <f6m4l8$i6i$1@sea.gmane.org> (message from Ralf Angeli on Fri, 06
	Jul 2007 21:20:10 +0200)
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74450
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/74450>

It seems confusing to have both `comment-forward' and
`forward-comment'.  Is it possible to make `comment-forward' support
backward motion?  Then we could rename `forward-comment' to
`comment-forward-internal' and alias it to `comment-forward'.