From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Multiple major modes
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:06:47 -0400
Message-ID: <E1I79zr-0007SL-F6@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <BNELLINCGFJLDJIKDGACGEEACAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183813721 7571 80.91.229.12 (7 Jul 2007 13:08:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:08:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 07 15:08:40 2007
connect(): Connection refused
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1I7A1g-0001Ow-7E
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:08:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I7A1f-0005Kh-Ng
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:08:39 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I79zp-0004eb-64
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:06:45 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I79zn-0004dW-C9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:06:44 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I79zn-0004dO-3e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:06:43 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1I79zm-0006js-OE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:06:42 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1I79zr-0007SL-F6; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:06:47 -0400
In-reply-to: <BNELLINCGFJLDJIKDGACGEEACAAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74436
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/74436>

    Perhaps it also depends on how one debugs? I tend not to use edebug; I use
    `debug-on-entry' and `(debug)'. Advice bothers me during debugging because
    the steps followed include a lot of advice stuff that muddies the waters,
    for me.

That is also how I do debugging.