From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: about the byte-opt.el patch
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:54:34 -0400
Message-ID: <E1I6Qqw-0007dA-OJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <loom.20070705T015713-397@post.gmane.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183640090 27333 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2007 12:54:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 12:54:50 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Feng Li <fengli@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 05 14:54:43 2007
connect(): Connection refused
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1I6Qr4-0007u9-Rd
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:54:43 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I6Qr5-0003ra-Ef
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:54:43 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I6Qr2-0003rA-18
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:54:40 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1I6Qr0-0003nA-6T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:54:39 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I6Qqz-0003mq-VK
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:54:37 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1I6Qqx-0005Ct-U3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:54:36 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1I6Qqw-0007dA-OJ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:54:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <loom.20070705T015713-397@post.gmane.org> (message from Feng Li
	on Thu, 5 Jul 2007 00:04:30 +0000 (UTC))
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74338
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/74338>

Would someone please revert that byte-opt patch?
Then please ack.