From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp: Re: emacs-22.1 with GTK dumps core when Gnome wigets clicked] Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:47:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <467A4F49.9040906@swipnet.se> <0B83D28B-95EF-4022-B447-63EA6BB3792E@raeburn.org> <87ir9c6k3t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <85y7i676qb.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182962887 3294 80.91.229.12 (27 Jun 2007 16:48:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 27 18:48:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I3agT-0005w7-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:48:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3agS-0004Jj-BJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:48:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I3agJ-0004GW-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:47:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I3agI-0004Fw-VQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:47:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I3agI-0004Fs-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:47:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I3agI-0001MV-41 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:47:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I3agH-0007r4-82; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:47:49 -0400 In-reply-to: <85y7i676qb.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 23:20:44 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73929 Archived-At: > (On the other hand, it would be easier to do this after the unicode > merge. I have several other cleanups that are also sitting around > waiting for the merge.) > > How about doing it now in the Unicode-2 branch? Unless I am mistaken, we have some semimanual merge going from the trunk to unicode-2 but not the other way round. So putting stuff in the trunk will tend to end up being less manual work. I presume the reason he wants to do these after the unicode-2 merge is that they interact with the unicode-2 changes, and would have to be done differently in the trunk and in unicode-2. If so, doing them now, only in unicode-2, would avoid the need for extra work. If they don't interact, then maybe then can be done in the trunk now.