From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: insert-file-contents and format-decode Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:26:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4666BF5F.5030301@gmx.at> <46753850.2090708@gmx.at> <46778ACB.1000704@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182623371 8178 80.91.229.12 (23 Jun 2007 18:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 23 20:29:30 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I2AMR-0002S1-3t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:29:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2AMQ-00062W-LF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:29:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2AJu-0004rz-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:26:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I2AJt-0004rH-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I2AJs-0004r8-Vv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I2AJs-0007TG-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:26:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I2AJs-0006pI-85; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:26:48 -0400 In-reply-to: <46778ACB.1000704@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:50:35 +0200) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73717 Archived-At: (1) The `format-decode' ("round-trip" as the new Elisp manual entry calls them) based functions are Lisp functions, may change the buffer, and may call the after-change functions for what they do. They precede, within `insert-file-contents', the after-change-functions call. That sounds like a bug to me. I guess signal_after_change should be done before `format-decode'. Does anyone disagree? Can you test such a change?